NEVER JUDGE A DECISION BY ITS OUTCOME – Outcome Bias

Posted on April 18, 2021 by Jimit Zaveri under Behavioral Finance

As an experiment, We prepare different chits and write down different stocks name on those piece of paper. Then we give it to different monkeys to pick it for a week. Few come out as a winner and few as losers. We continue playing the same with winners only. Over some time, one monkey comes as a right in all the time. The media calls that monkey a successful monkey and call everyone to understand his success mantra.

This is an outcome bias; we tend to evaluate decisions based on the result rather than on the decision process. When a person has a good performance track record of stocks picking then we consider him as a good stock picker or an expert rather than knowing the process or it can be possible that past results can be due to pure luck. I met few fund managers who do not read books or annual reports thoroughly but they have survived for 10-12 years so people call them successful and an expert.

In conclusion: never judge a decision purely by its result, especially when randomness or ‘external factors’ play a role. A bad result does not automatically indicate a bad decision and vice versa. So rather than tearing your hair out about a wrong decision, or applauding yourself for one that may have only coincidentally led to success, remember why you chose? what you did?. When we start understanding the process behind success, then we can easily recognize success as a part of luck or efforts.

This entire series will be review with various examples from books which are “Thinking, Fast and Slow” and “The Art of Thinking Clearly“.

THE DUBIOUS EFFICACY OF DOCTORS, CONSULTANTS AND PSYCHOTHERAPISTS -Regression to Mean

Posted on April 11, 2021 by Jimit Zaveri under Behavioral Finance

Everything in a world moves toward an extreme direction from average and come back to average. This is known as a regression to mean. Sometimes we get more happy or sad and as time passes, we start coming back to our normal feelings. We tend to be nice to other people when they please us and nasty when they do not, we are statistically punished for being nice and rewarded for being nasty.

Poor performance was typically followed by improvement and good performance by deterioration, without any help from either praise or punishment. Our performance has an average point, sometimes we perform very better than average and sometimes perform below average and sometimes reach back to mean performance. So that when performance is above or below average, then it has a higher probability to meet the average which is known as a regression to the mean.

Investment – The price of the companies sometimes go either extreme to fundamental points but as time passes stock prices start moving towards fundamental performance and at some point fundamental performance and stock prices marched. The stock price cannot be sustained at either extreme. We have seen various cyclical events, business cycle and many more are responsible for the regression to the mean. We have experienced that market always walk away from averages for a period but it comes near to mean by its self-correcting nature. So that when anything moves at the extreme side of the mean then we must have to be ready for self-correction of it. Value investing mainly focus on reversion to mean theory. It believes that if the stock price is well below its fundamental value then now or later it will catch up with its fundamental value.

We have seen that the best performance in equities has come after the worst performance and vice-versa. So that we should not focus on a smaller period of outcome to make any conclusion. Rather should focus on a decently long period to understand mean reversion. But when fundamental performance is improving then we should compare market price with improving fundamental performance rather should wait to fall in price as it has risen in past. Also, we need to study thoroughly about fundamental of any business, its prospects, challenges faced by the business. Rather believing that if the business has performed well in past then it will repeat it in future. It may or may not repeat the same performance but that we have to conclude from a detail study of business.

This entire series will be review with various examples from books which are “Thinking, Fast and Slow” and “The Art of Thinking Clearly“.

NEVER PAY YOUR LAWYER BY THE HOUR – Incentive Super-Response Tendency

Posted on April 4, 2021 by Jimit Zaveri under Behavioral Finance

People respond to incentives by doing what is in their best interests. What is noteworthy is, first, how quickly and radically people’s behaviour changes when incentives come into play or are altered and, second, the fact that people respond to the incentives themselves and not the grander intentions behind them.

We all seek self-interest; our efforts get changed with incentives. We act for getting back something. Proper incentives can improve performance but improper incentives can spoil the performance. We assess the risks and the associated rewards and respond in a way that seems to best serve us.

Business – For example, incentives for selling every single loan will spoil credit quality but if we keep negatives incentives on every NPAs then performance will get improves with safety in nature. The sub-prime housing crisis in the US is one example of incentive bias.

Investment – There will be incentives on different products to marketing personnel and due to that incentives, they sell products where they get higher incentives. The same happens with the stock market products. We have experienced Franklin mutual fund debt scheme example where distributors have decent commission available. And distributors have aggressively sold scheme to the investors.

Many a time, management focus on their performance incentive over an above of long-term benefits of shareholders. That is the reason to provide ESOP to top management (aggressive ESOP has its disadvantage, which we will discuss later on).

When we study pieces of advice given to us by others than 90% of cases having incentive effects hidden into it. We need to study the given pieces of advice thoroughly before accepting it. If we work on anyone’s advised without putting our efforts then that will become our fault.

This entire series will be review with various examples from books which are “Thinking, Fast and Slow” and “The Art of Thinking Clearly“.

DON’T ACCEPT FREE DRINKS – Reciprocity

Posted on January 3, 2021 by Jimit Zaveri under Behavioral Finance

Many NGOs, philanthropic institutions give us a gift and welcome us. After that when they feel that we have fallen under the softcore for them due to gift, they ask for the donation. Reciprocity is a very useful survival strategy, a form of risk management.

It is at the core of cooperation between people who are not related to each other and a necessary ingredient for economic growth and wealth creation. Reciprocity rule said that we try to repay what we get from someone. At last, we all are social animals. And when we give something to someone, we expect something in return. This is how our social life has been designed. This bias is so strong that by this, we can influence thinking and decision making of other people.

Business – This method is best used by marketing fellow who comes to us with some exciting advice free of cost and in return, we will buy what they are selling. When sales personnel put lots of efforts on us then we try to buy something from them. When any company keeps taking care of their customers such as sending wishes on their birthday, anniversary, sending gifts, etc. then those happy customers will buy services from that company on a repeated basis.

Investment – when we like the products or services of a particular company, we try to put our money into it. It is a good decision at some extend but without digging in detail putting money is an unwise decision.

Many a time, our advisors also get some benefits from the company or they like the products or services of the company so that they issue buy recommendations. Opposite of it that sometimes, any unsatisfied with the product or service of any company to any of our advisors then they might start advising to stay away from that company to put money.

We should not blindly follow anyone rather doing their homework. For overcoming this bias, we need to give us a time, we need to dig deeper on each aspect of the company. We need to write down a thesis which contains the opposite side of our decision. It’s difficult to kill your idea but its necessary.

One of the power generation and transmission business – very lower return to no return in the last 14 years